The Roles and Effects of Migration in Africa Essay

To accurately analyze various impacts of migration, one must first understand clearly the meaning of migration. Migration is the process or means by which people move from one geographical location to another geographical location (Castle and Miller, 2009). However, migration plays a key role in the development of both developed and developing countries. According to (Castle and Miller, 2009), â€Å"we are well into a post industrial, post-cold war world and about to embark on a brand new century within which immigration will play a central role†. Migration of people is not a new phenomenon, as people have always migrated from one country to another for various reasons. However, these movements may have certain enormous effect on the†¦show more content†¦The â€Å"brain drain† phenomenon is also considered to be a setback for Africa; in the sense that the educational level of persons that are leaving the continent to other parts of the world is sometimes high; and many of those people subsequently do no return to their home country afterwards. Brain drain has left many African nations short of skills which are needed to meet the challenges of development in the twenty first century (El-Khawas, 2004, Pg: 37). According to Beine et al (2008), they define brain drain as the international transfer of resources in the form of human capital and mainly applies to the migration of relatively high educated individuals from the developing to the developed countries (Beine et all, 2008, Pg : 631). However, in another terms, the brain drain represents the outflow of one of the most, for many countries, scarce resources (human capital). Therefore, according to the definition, one should be conscious of the effect which brain drain might have upon the economic development for mostly underdeveloped countries. However, considering brain drain, its effects and the incentives behind those international transfers of human capital has become essential. The brain drain can be divided into two different categories. There are certain people on one hand who have fully completed their education in Africa and afterwards they decide to migrate to otherShow MoreRelatedLast Grave Of Dimbaza Analysis1326 Words   |  6 PagesToday I will be constructing an analysis along the bases of migration, exploring the film â€Å"Last Grave of Dimbaza,† which occurs during the Apartheid era and comparing it to the book â€Å"Living, Loving, and Lying awake at Night by Sindiwe Magona,† which explores the idea of forced migration from the womans point of view. Both the film and the book exhibit the differences amongst the Whites and Blacks within South Africa. In compare and contrast, the film establishes a ground of separating the urbanRead MoreThe Effect of Rural-Urban Migration in South Africa Essay1682 Words   |  7 PagesInvestigating the effect of rural-urban migration on the four districts of the North West province in South Africa u sing Manova technique. INTRODUCTION This proposal is about the effect of rural-urban migration on the four districts of the North West province in South Africa. It entails the background of rural-urban migration as well as the statement of the problem, main objectives, other specific objectives, rationale, hypotheses, identification of variables, the theories of other people concerningRead MoreThe Economic Effects of the Slave Trade on Africa, Britain, and America1398 Words   |  6 Pagesowners and captains soon derived a fantastic plan that would take advantage of the goods in America, Britain, and Africa. Today this fantastic plan is non-other than the triangle trade. In the triangle trade, crops like cotton, tobacco, and sugar from America were transported to England. From England, textiles, rum and manufactured goods were transported to Africa. Then from Africa, slaves were transported to the Americas. Even though these slaves were real human beings they were referred to asRead MoreColonization of Africa1542 Wor ds   |  7 Pagesfollowing essay will highlight the effects of colonialism on the developing world from an economic, political and social perspective. The colonization of Africa has a long history, and can be explained as being set in motion as early as 200 AD, with the migration of Bantu speaking Africans from central Africa to the south of Africa due to the agricultural boom and overpopulation of tribes, known as one of the largest human migrations in history (ref). Following the migration of the Bantu language groupRead MoreStuart Halls Cultural Identity and Diaspora1599 Words   |  7 PagesOuahani Nasr-edine A Paper about Stuart Hall’s article: Cultural Identity and Diaspora Stuart hall talks about the crucial role of the â€Å"Third Cinemas† in promoting the Afro-Caribbean cultural identities, the Diaspora hybridity and difference. Hall argues that the role of the â€Å"Third Cinemas† is not simply to reflect what is already there; rather, their crucial role is to produce representations which constantly constitute the third world’s peoples as new subjects against their representationsRead MoreFactors Affecting Employment in Kenya1307 Words   |  6 Pagesare a number of factors that have continued to affect employment in Kenya. These factors are traced from colonial era and continue to have influence even today. The major factors discussed in this paper include:economic factor, political factor, migration factor, organizational factor and demographic factors (gender and ethnicity factor). Economic Factor Kenya s economy is market-based, with some state-owned infrastructure enterprises, and maintains a liberalized external trade system. The economyRead MoreStudy About Ofw1697 Words   |  7 Pagesmentioned earlier, the Philippines is one of the largest labor-sending countries and largest recipients of remittances. Increasing attention to the role of remittances in the Philippine economy has been occurring. However, currently, there are limited studies done to probe the migration-poverty nexus. Pernia [2006] conducts a study to investigate the role of remittances in poverty alleviation and regional development utilizing panel data on the regions of the Philippines. The study empirically testsRead Morechanges in Africa from 500 C.E to 1500 C.E783 Words   |  4 PagesChanges in Africa from 500 C.E to 1500C.E The role of religion has changed over time in West Africa from the migration of Islam bringing its new faith, rituals, and establishment of a greater connection with the outside world through trade and cultural diffusion. However the unique African religion that existed beforehand was still retained; the African culture still believing in animism and polytheism even after the spread of Islam. From 1000-1500 CE the role of religion has seen changes and continuitiesRead MoreDoes Better Living And Citizenship Drive Immigrants Help Obtain More Qualifications Than Local Citizens?1617 Words   |  7 Pagesthey do focus on the UK, its effect are assessed only for ethnic minorities. (Lindley 2009). A focus on an aggregated scale of all races will supplement the literature where I intend to test whether immigrants are likely to be more over-qualified than UK born citizens and then compare the effect on earnings for each of the two observation groups. Furthermore, having obtained a result on over-qualification, I will proceed to conduct a second test, examining what effects this has on naturalisationRead MoreThe United States And Western Europe999 Words   |  4 PagesIn the 21st century in developing countries there are a large number of foreign people fleeing their countries of origins to arrive into first world nations such as the united states and western Europe. The news have been publishing a â€Å"migration crisis†, which is many people from the middle east and other unstable countries –e.g. Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Eritrea etc.- and arriving in western Europe in almost millions each month and thousands each day. The reason for that is because their countrie s

An Anti

An Anti-abortion Argument Essay Abortion in America is a controversial issue in which both sides have valid arguments at face value. The pro-choice side has many arguments to support it belief in keeping abortion legal. Many of these are faulty, and argue points irrelevent to the issue as I will attempt to illustrate, thereby eliminating the main pro-choice arguments. The pro-life position has somewhat different ideas. The most popular of these is: The unborn entity is fully human from the moment of conception. Abortion results in the intentional death of the unborn entity. Therefore, abortion can be defined the intentional killing of a human being. This killing is in most cases unjustified, since the unborn human being has a full right to life. If, however, there is a high probability that a womans pregnancy will result in her death (such as tubal pregnancy, for example), then abortion is justified. For it is a greater good that one human should live (the mother) rather than two die (the mother and her child). Or, in such cases the intent is not to kill the unborn but to save the life of the mother. With the exception of such cases, abortion is an act in which an innocent human being is intentionally killed; therefore, abortion should be made illegal, as are all other such acts of killing. One argument made by people in favor of abortion is an appeal to pity. When one fallaciously argues by appealing to pity, one is arguing that certain actions should be permitted or tolerated out of pity for those performing them when in fact the basis for showing them pity is not a legitimate basis for the action. For example, a woman who argues that she should not receive a parking ticket because her child was crying and she took her child to a candy store to cheer her up is appealing to pity. The following abortion rights arguments are examples. Anyone who goes to pro-choice demonstrations in the United States will see on pro-choice buttons a drawing of a coat hanger. This is the symbol of the pro-choice movement representing the many women who were harmed or killed because they either performed illegal abortions on themselves (i.e., the surgery was performed with a coat hanger) or went to physicians. That means, if abortion is made illegal, then women will once again be harmed. This argument does sound true. Although the thought of finding a dead young woman with a bloody coat hanger dangling between her legs is unpleasant,and powerful, it does not make a good argument. The reason this argument doesnt work is because it is begging the question. In fact, this lie hides behind a good percentage of the popular arguments for the pro-choice position. One begs the question when one assumes what one is trying to prove is correct. The question-begging of the coat-hanger argument is very obvious: but only by assuming that the unborn are not fully human does the argument work. If the unborn are not fully human, then the pro-choicer has a legitimate concern, just as one would have in overturning a law forbidding appendicitis operations if countless people were needlessly dying of both appendicitis and illegal operations. But if the unborn are fully human, this pro-choice argument is the same as saying that because people die or are harmed while killing other people, the state should make it safe for them to do so. Even some pro-choicers, who argue for their position in other ways, admit that thecoat hanger/back-alley argument is crap. Although statistics cant establish a particular moral position, there has been arguments over both the actual number of illegal abortions and the number of women who died as a result of them before legalization. Prior to Roe vs Wade, pro-choicers used saying that nearly a million women every year obtained illegal abortions performed with rusty coat hangers in back-alleys that resulted in thousands of fatalities. Given the seriousness of the issue at hand, these statements are more than exaggerations, because several proven facts establish that the pro-choice movement was lying. .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec , .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec .postImageUrl , .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec , .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec:hover , .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec:visited , .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec:active { border:0!important; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec:active , .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7555178d3cb1cf28413b74c782615dec:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Prostitution EssayAnother argument by people in support of pro-choice say that before abortion was legalized, rich pregnant women were able to travel to other countries to get abortions.

Abortion as a Сurrent Public Policy Issue

Abortion as a Ð ¡urrent Public Policy Issue Abortion as a current public policy issue/controversy in the news today Controversies arise because of different opinions of people due to individual uniqueness in beliefs, logical reasoning, religious, political, and social economic backgrounds that often lead to heated and argumentative discussions. While there are numerous public policy issues, the paper tables the scope, cost, policies, solutions, stakeholders, and institutions that address abortion in the United States of America as an issue aired in the news nowadays.Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on Abortion as a Ð ¡urrent Public Policy Issue specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Thousands of issues seem right in the eyes of majority, but are appealing to the minority or persons benefiting from them (Lejano, Leong, 2012, p. 796). The argumentative topic on abortion is a concern for public as depicted by the participation of several people in today’s ne ws all over the world. However, in looking at the fundamental issues related to abortion, education, legal and activism, sex and sexism, drug and substance abuse, and health care reform cannot be overemphasized considering the fact that abortion is a process and not an accident. The question over whether or not the government should legalize abortion has hit the recent news with Americans having divided opinions. The United States’ abortion procedures ignited public attention in 2010 and 2011 (Campbell, 2011, p.963: Gerwin, 2012, p. 632). Opponents stress that life begins at conception, and therefore abortion inflicts excruciation in the unborn child. Proponents claim that failure to legalize abortion makes pregnant women opt to risky abortion methods and that governmental or religious authority should not limit their abortion rights (Bisignano, 2009, p. 745). Consequently, the issue has seen the emergence of social and political activists who have polarized the debate on abo rtion in order to gain popularity within the public. In my view, it does not matter the sides where one belongs to as long as the arguments can withstand the test of time, are in line with the fundamental freedoms and rights of the people, and are in accordance with societal moral standards and principles. Both the proponents and opponents acknowledge that abortion is an issue of life and death, which is accomplished out of one’s personal initiatives. Just like death, abortion does not discriminate based on the doer of the act whether a well-informed or uneducated mother, poor or rich mother, young or old mother, under or not under the influence of drug.Advertising Looking for term paper on public administration? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The outcomes and objectives are related (Gerwin, 2012, p. 634). However, any attempt to minimize the long lasting abortion debate should aim at changing people’s attitude towards sex, drug, and substance abuse that enhance early or unplanned pregnancies among women. Besides, prevention is better than cure. With endless arguments on abortion, adequate education and awareness as well as proper health care reforms on abortion are inevitable. Description and analysis of the scope of abortion Throughout history, abortion methods have often been unsafe since they can result in serious injuries and sometimes death to the women. The fundamental argument for allowing abortion has been to abolish unsafe abortion methods done in societies where abortion was illegal and without the support of specialists. The variation in arguments on issues of abortion is indeed a public concern (Campbell, 2011, p.967). Both opponents and proponents to some extent accept that abortion can act as a last resort under unavoidable circumstances such as when a womans life is at risk and or in case of rape or incest (Pollman, 2012, p. 185). The community argues that surgica l and medical abortions are the most common types of abortion procedures used by women while therapeutic, elective, spontaneous, and induced abortions are rarely used (Lejano, Leong, 2012, p. 807). However, death of the infant or mother or both may occur whether or not a specialist helps in the process. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than eighty percent of the US counties provide abortion services where an estimated five times black women as white women do abortion per day (Uscinski, 2009, p. 798). The legislative enactment and amendment on abortion is another fundamental public concern. The amendment ensures that federal ban on public funding for abortion forms a part of the States’ constitution in order to reduce the scope of the State privacy law. In addition, the national abortion reporting laws and policies in America fail to inform and guide on issues related to public policy in a timely manner (Gerwin, 2012, p. 642). The US sta rted criminalizing abortion since 1821. Physicians mainly influenced the move fearing its safety. By 1965, the entire US had outlawed abortion. However, according to World Health Organization Report released in 2006, each year, abortion causes several maternal deaths in regions where it is not legal (Uscinski, 2009, p. 998). In this case, people discuss issues of life and death and problems arising from the legalization and illegalization of abortion (Campbell, 2011, p.972). Compliance with abortion reporting laws has also proven difficult. There is the inability of ascertaining the inputs of various medical conditions to maternal deaths and giving complete reports on abortion (Pollman, 2012, p. 199).Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on Abortion as a Ð ¡urrent Public Policy Issue specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Lack of reliable measurements makes calculation of the relative safety and danger of induced abortion a nd delivery not viable. The challenge has spackled a public debate. Moreover, public health agencies are unable to enforce the existing reporting laws making it problematic in understanding the real issues about abortion. The stakeholders and affected constituencies Issues of abortion do not have specific stakeholders because they cut across all humanity. However, the humanity can be categorized into primary, secondary, and key stakeholders. Beneficiaries are those who aim at gaining either money or service from the abortion process. They include individuals who are experiencing the risk for a particular problem or abortionists and those who help in carrying out the process: the physicians (Gerwin, 2012, p. 650). Secondary stakeholders comprise those directly involved with beneficiaries such as parents, spouses, siblings, children, friends, teachers, counselors. Secondary stakeholders also involve people whose jobs or lives can be influenced by the abortion process especially if the y do or fail to report the act of abortion (Lejano, Leong, 2012, p. 811). They comprise community members, employers, contractors, proprietors, police, and other law enforcement agencies. Key stakeholders include those with an interest in the abortion outcome and those who can influence decisions government officials and policy makers (Uscinski, 2009, p. 805). Government officials and policy makers such as state or federal agencies, governors, local board members, and legislators have the responsibility of devising, passing, and enforcing laws and regulations, which may or may not fulfill the set goals (Uscinski, 2009, p. 812). In deed, if the governments allowed women to abort unnecessarily, some of the world’s great leaders and scientists would not have been born. If death occurs, the families and communities in which it occurs are affected psychologically, socially, economically, and politically (Campbell, 2011, p.966). Women, their spouses, and the unborn are the direct bearers of the consequences of abortion. According to Breast Cancer Prevention Institute (BCPI) and the Catholic Medical Association (CMA) in 2006, abortion increases the likelihood of women developing breast cancer and future miscarriages (Pollman, 2012, p. 206). Relevant political institutions to the policy discussion about Abortion Even though physicians do not entertain social, cultural, and religious issues in analyzing the relationship between abortion politics and policies, abortion has proved to be a divisive political issue in the United States since the reign of Roe Wade (Pollman, 2012, p. 183). Political institutions are central in the issue.Advertising Looking for term paper on public administration? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Consequently, through federalism, judicial review, and a private health care system, the Americans consider abortion simply as an individual right rather than a medical requirement (Uscinski, 2009, p. 814). The nature and structure of the US political parties give abortion proponents and opponents the opportunity to initiate and accommodate abortion issue in their political agenda. Legal complexity, political factors, structures, and values are responsible for evolution of abortion policy. Political institutions and ideologies â€Å"†¦affect the nature and timing of policy decisions on abortion thus contributing distinctively to policy differences across nations† (Bejesky, 2012, p. 967). The controversy surrounding the topic of abortion sparkled in the US Congress health care debate in 2010 with the opponents and proponents in the House of Representatives and the Senate trading accusations. Unlike the proponents who want equal treatment of all in the health care services , opponents of abortion did not want beneficiaries of insurance subsidies to receive Federal funding for any abortion (Gerwin, 2012, p. 645). The health care reform bill sailed through the House of Representatives that followed by the signing of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and an executive order by President Barack Obama to ensure that federal funds are not used for abortion services (Pollman, 2012, p. 218). President Ronald Reagan declared the Mexico City Policy during Mexico Conference that limits all nongovernmental groups sponsored by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) from enhancing abortion services (Uscinski, 2009, p. 803). While in 2009, President Obama issued a memorandum repealing the Mexico City Policy stating that it weakens efforts of promoting safe and effective voluntary family planning programs. The observable of economic challenges and political interests indicate forces influencing fertility-related practices, values, and policies in the United States Policies proposed to address Abortion Abortion policies in the United States involve criminalization of abortion in the states and enactment of abortion laws by the federal government. Despite state public debate on abortion in 2011, Roe Wade declared federal actions that the majority of the state anti-abortion laws were unconstitutional (Gerwin, 2012, p. 647). The declaration forced proponents to push for federal policies that would restrict abortion. Congress passed Hyde Amendment bill for the Department of Health and Human Services limiting federal funding for abortion, which was an amendment that had been under constant review since its inception (Pollman, 2012, p. 221). Moreover, abortion policies aim at maintaining morality, economic development, and national security. Congressional attacks on reproductive rights intensified opponents of choice and pro-choice to introduce abortion policies that promote their political agendas (Pollman, 2012, p. 195). The Hea lth Care Reform adopted by both houses has imposed abortion restrictions on women by barring them from insurance coverage and accessing abortion services. Judicial nominations defend reproductive health care for the future generations (Campbell, 2011, p.970). Notwithstanding, courts are paramount in asserting all human rights including ensuring access, threats to abortion rights, and reproductive choice in the US. Therefore, Prevention First amendments and Rights for a Fetus Act aims at denying millions of women their abortion coverage further weakening their access to abortion care (Deirdre, 2011, p.196). Prevention First Act aims at increasing access to preventive health care services and to initiate programs, which reduce unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act (CIANA) provides that only parents should be involved in helping a minor woman. However, any trusted person within or without the family can be federally prosecut ed for helping a woman who may be a victim of family abuse, rape, or incest. NAF emphasizes that state abortion legislations impact directly on women’s health across the country (Gerwin, 2012, p. 636). It guarantees protection of abortion providers and abortionists. NAF public policy advocates for fair and independent judiciary that guarantees women’s right to safe and legal abortion. According to the Supreme Court ruling, federal abortion ban interferes with physicians’ ability to make proper medical decisions (Pollman, 2012, p. 212). Solution to Abortion and the Factors behind the Solution A part from suitable education that changes and creates awareness on sex, drugs, and abortions, congress should adequately finance Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in order to gather data for a national abortion report to upgrade surveillance (Deirdre, 2011, p.193). This will ensure effective public policy implementation on abortion issues as stipulated in the report. In ad dition, governments should encourage every state to adopt the goal of issuing cumulative statistical data on abortion on a timely basis including monthly and annual reports (Uscinski, 2009, p. 801). Publication of the reports greatly helps policymakers, private sector actors, and other stakeholders in devising, testing, and evaluating awareness, education, and public health strategies in order to make abortion less frequent and ultimately rare (Pollman, 2012, p. 203). The federal government should urge all states to revise their statutes to improve standards of care in the growing role of medical abortions across the nation. Laws should clearly stipulate the roles of pharmacists, non-physicians, nurses, and midwives who purport to perform abortions as well as any institution that employs a physician from within or outside the state in the country who prescribes drugs for abortion (Campbell, 2011, p.973). Moreover, abortions may or may not involve minor and major operations. Therefor e, parental notice legislations deserve more attention in order for them to receive timely information in case of abortion (Pollman, 2012, p. 234). Congress should reinforce abortion-reporting laws with the help of the public and or impose realistic financial disincentives on the states that deliberately fail to submit reports. Cost of Abortion to the Americans: How much would it cost to address the issue? If the costs are unknown, why are they unknown? Ideally, the strength and inconsistency of abortion legislatives in the US make the cost of addressing very unpredictable. However, lack of sufficient comparative data on abortion policy execution and law implementation have put a lot of emphasis on laws and legislation as well as judicial decisions whose implementation requires thousands of the US dollars (Gerwin, 2012, p. 639). The executive has increased the price of competent abortion services, rates of maternal morbidity, mortality, and medical techniques, and knowledge among ca re providers and consumers leading to higher costs of public policy on abortion in the US. There is legislation that measures and determines the extent of psychological damage in an individual resulting from abortion. The psychological disturbance has diverse effects on humans especially when no immediate attention is given. The study published by the Southern Medical Journal in 1998 and 2002 identifies that more than one hundred and fifty percent of women who aborted are more likely to commit suicide in relation to those who carry the pregnancy to the term. In addition, more than fifty percent of men whose partners have abortions reported regret, sadness, and depression (Uscinski, 2009, p. 796). Notwithstanding, those who steer abortion are â€Å"more interested in making profits instead of assisting their clients† (Deirdre, 2011, p.190). Irrespective of the method, any abortion costs about between three hundred and fifty to one thousand dollars. A study in 2009 indicated th at, while abortion industry makes over eight hundred million dollars annually, the country uses nearly equal amounts towards abortion including public policy issues. In my view, instead of a women wanting to or aborting, they should give their unwanted babies to persons who cannot biologically conceive in order to save the country from spending such a huge amount of money on abortion-related issues. Is the public policy issue one faced by both the federal government and state governments? Indeed, many problems that befall different communities in the United States of America can not only be solved by the State or Federal governments but also through initiatives and actions taken in the private sphere (Gerwin, 2012, p. 646). As the government aims to adopt laws and regulations to address public policy problems, individuals and families with or without the involvement of civil societies such as socio-economic and political associations establish programs towards obtaining a lasting so lution to the problem (Campbell, 2011, p.965: Reynolds, 2011, p. 973). However, policymaking process can prove very challenging in terms of who will benefit and bear any risk resulting from them. Consequently, the stakeholders repeatedly reassess, re-examine, and revise the undertakings thus making the process lack a clear starting or end. In addition, the process of making public policies involves the problem, players, and the policy. It takes place following rational model stages. Agenda setting is the first step in which agencies and government officials discuss the proposed problem (Deirdre, 2011, p.187). The option formulation step precedes the implementation stage, and involves laying alternative solutions and final decisions regarding the best policies (Pollman, 2012, p. 189). During implementation, the private sector, public sector, and other government organs can easily interpret policies to check for several common challenges such as personal interests, political affiliati ons, and personalities that influence the players through the entire process. Conclusion The interest of the public is to understand and be involved in formulating abortion policies that will recognize and guide women and girls doing abortion, at any stage of the child development, in the presence or absence of physicians (Campbell, 2011, p.962). In addition, the existence of a strong public curiosity about making abortion a rare event in spite of its legal status in the nation cannot be overruled. Therefore, the only suitable way to gather the right information about abortion and to protect abortionists’ privacy and individual health is to examine and understand the scope and cost of and the policies, solutions, stakeholders, and institutions that address abortion in the United States of America as it is in the news today. Reference List Bejesky, R. (2012). Public diplomacy or propaganda? Targeted messages and tardy corrections to unverified reporting. Capital University Law Review, 40(1), 967. Bisignano, J. (2009). Current issues in public policy: Whistleblowing and the intentional distortion of news. Journal of Law Public Policy, 6(1), 745. Campbell, A. (2011). Policy Feedbacks and the Impact of Policy Designs on Public Opinion.  Journal of Health Politics, Policy Law, 36(6), 961-973. Deirdre, K. (2011). The Public Policy Pedagogy of Corporate and Alternative News Media.  Studies in Philosophy Education, 30(2), 185-198. Gerwin, L. (2012). The Challenge of Providing the Public with Actionable Information during a Pandemic. Journal of Law, Medicine Ethics, 40(3), 630-654. Lejano, R., Leong, C. (2012). A Hermeneutic Approach to Explaining and Understanding Public Controversies. Journal of Public Administration Research Theory, 22(4), 793-814. Pollman, E. (2012). Information issues on Wall Street 2.0. University of Pennsylvania Law  Review, 161(1), 179-241. Reynolds, R. (2011). Google news and public policys influence on fair use in online in fringement controversies. Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development, 25(1), 973. Uscinski, J. (2009). When Does the Publics Issue Agenda Affect the Medias Issue Agenda (and Vice-Versa)? Developing a Framework for Media-Public Influence. Social Science  Quarterly (Blackwell Publishing Limited, 4(1), 796-815.

8 Requisitos Esenciales del Matrimonio para Inmigración

8 Requisitos Esenciales del Matrimonio para Inmigracià ³n Es bien sabido que tanto los ciudadanos americanos como los residentes permanentes legales pueden pedir para sus esposos una tarjeta de residencia, tambià ©n conocida como la green card. Y esto aplica tanto a los matrimonios entre una mujer y un varà ³n como a los de dos personas del mismo sexo. Adems, el matrimonio  una de las formas ms rpidas de obtener la residencia, si bien es ms rpido en el caso de peticiones cursadas por ciudadanos que las solicitadas por residentes. Pero para que esta tramitacià ³n migratoria llegue a buen puerto, Inmigracià ³n establece que necesario  que el matrimonio cumpla con una seria de caracterà ­sticas. En este artà ­culo se explican cules son los requisitos que debe cumplir el matrimonio para inmigracià ³n y tambià ©n cules pueden ser los problemas que dan lugar a la negacià ³n de la green card. Y es que el matrimonio por sà ­ solo no garantiza la obtencià ³n de la residencia. Para empezar, cuatro requisitos que aplican a todos los matrimonios, sin importar el lugar de celebracià ³n. A continuacià ³n se explican otros cuatro requisitios que deben cumplir cuando el matrimonio tiene lugar en Estados Unidos o uno de sus territorios, como por ejemplo, Puerto Rico. 4 requisitos delmatrimonio para Inmigracià ³n sin importar lugar de celebracià ³n Para que las autoridades migratorias aprueben una tarjeta de residencia por matrimonio, à ©ste debe cumplir los siguientes ​cuatro  requisitos: En primer lugar, legalidad. El matrimonio tiene que  tener validez en el lugar de su celebracià ³n, adems, tiene que poder obtenerse un documento oficial en el que consta su celebracià ³n.  Son vlidos tanto los religiosos como los civiles y cualquier otra fà ³rmula que sea aceptada como vlida en la localidad en la el casorio tuvo lugar.​ En segundo lugar, debe ser de buena fe. Lo que tambià ©n se conoce con el nombre de bona fide. Esto es, que se trata de un matrimonio de verdad, no uno que se ha celebrado con el objetivo de que uno de los contrayentes pueda sacar los papeles para la residencia permanente.  Los matrimonios falsos son perseguidos por el Servicio de Ciudadanà ­a e Inmigracià ³n (USCIS, por sus siglas en inglà ©s).  Los castigos pueden ser severos.   En tercer lugar, es necesaria la presencia en la boda. Ambas partes conyugales deben estar presentes. Es decir, como regla general no se admiten los matrimonios por poder. Si este es tu caso, debers probar que despuà ©s del casorio ha habido una consumacià ³n de la relacià ³n (ha habido sexo entre los esposos). En cuarto lugar, se exige solterà ­a. Hay que ser soltero o divorciado o ser viudo o haber obtenido la anulacià ³n de un matrimonio anterior. No se admite ni la bigamia ni la poligamia. 4 requisitos adicionales si el matrimonio se celebra en Estados Unidos Las bodas y sus requisitos son un asunto regulado por cada estado. Esto quiere decir que tienes que cumplir con las leyes del lugar en el que celebra.  Debes tener en cuenta estos 4 requisitos: 1. Residencia. En algunos estados debers residir en el estado por un nà ºmero de dà ­as para poder casarte. En otros no. Esto quiere decir que puedes casarte legalmente en algunos estados en los que no vives, pero en otros no ser posible. Lo importante es que una vez que se celebra el matrimonio en EEUU respetando las leyes estatales del lugar ser reconocido por todos los estados y, lo ms importante para inmigracià ³n, por el gobierno federal. 2. Edad. Si tienes 18 aà ±os, puedes contraer matrimonio libremente. Si eres ms joven debers verificar las leyes de tu estado. En muchos es posible casarse con 16, pero en otros ser preciso el consentimiento de los padres. Para edades ms jà ³venes siempre se va a necesitar dicho consentimiento e incluso en algunos estados el de un juez. 3. Parentesco. Si te quieres casar con un primo carnal (en primer grado) debers comprobar las leyes locales, ya que aproximadamente la mitad de los estados lo prohà ­be o establece serias limitaciones de edad requiriendo que los novios hayan dejado atrs la edad de procrear. 4. Common law. En algunos estados se considera matrimonio cuando dos personas se ponen de acuerdo en vivir juntas y proclamarse pà ºblicamente como esposos. Esto es posible si vives en Alabama, Carolina del Sur, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma, Pensilvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Utah y el Distrito de Columbia. Si este es tu caso antes de presentar los papeles habla con un abogado de inmigracià ³n o consulta directamente con el USCIS, lo que puedes hacer con el servicio de INFOPASS. Por supuesto que los matrimonios celebrados en el Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico son reconocidos por las autoridades de inmigracià ³n a todos los efectos migratorios. 6 problemas que pueden surgir en la tramitacià ³n de la residencia por matrimonio A pesar de estar casado legalmente y de  buena fe con un ciudadano estadounidense o un residente permanente legal puede darse el caso de que las autoridades migratorias no aprueben para el cà ³nyuge pedido la green card, o la visa de inmigrante si est en el extranjero. Las razones pueden ser varias, destacando las siguientes: 1. Que la persona que presenta la peticià ³n, es decir, el ciudadano o el residente, haya sido condenado por un delito que impide solicitar los papeles para un familiar segà ºn la ley Adam Walsh.   2. Que la persona que presenta la peticià ³n no tenga los recursos econà ³micos que pide la ley para poder patrocinar a un familiar. Este tema es particularmente problemtico cuando se trata de un ciudadano americano que lleva tiempo viviendo en otro paà ­s y desea regresarse a los Estados Unidos acompaà ±ado de su cà ³nyuge. En todo caso, tener presente que si se carecen de medios econà ³micos la ley permite buscar co-patrocinador para firmar la declaracià ³n de sostenimiento (affidavit of support). 3. Que el matrimonio sea considerado falso por Inmigracià ³n. Tener en cuenta que es posible la denuncia anà ³nima de matrimonios de conveniencia. 4. Que la persona que presenta la peticià ³n decide ponerle fin durante su tramitacià ³n. 5. Que se produce un divorcio. Esto podrà ­a  ser especialmente problemtico en los casos de residencias permanentes concedidas condicionalmente por un periodo de dos aà ±os, pero no es el à ºnico caso. 6. Que la persona extranjera para la que se piden los papeles sea inadmisible. Es decir, que la residencia se deniegue por una de estas 42 causas. En este punto hay que tener en cuenta que el problema surge al final de la tramitacià ³n. Es decir, se obtiene la aprobacià ³n de la primera gestià ³n, que es el formulario I-130, pero al final Inmigracià ³n dice no. En este apartado de considerar al extranjero como inadmisible destacar dos casos, aunque no son los à ºnicos. En primer lugar, si se ha ingresado a los Estados Unidos con visa K-1 de prometido de ciudadano americano, es necesario casarse con la persona que realizà ³ la peticià ³n. No es posible casarse con otra distinta. Esto solo da lugar a problemas y muy serios.   En segundo lugar, el problema que surge cuando el extranjero pedido est ilegalmente en los Estados Unidos. Si se encuentra en la actualidad como indocumentado decir que si se casa con un residente permanente no podr arreglar los papeles por esa causa, porque no puede ajustar su estatus. P​or el contrario, si  se casa con un ciudadano americano hay una gran diferencia entre las personas que ingresaron a los Estados Unidos legalmente y que sà ­ pueden ajustar su estatus y aquellos que cruzaron ilegalmente, que no pueden hacerlo. Las personas en esta à ºltima situacià ³n tienen que salir de los Estados Unidos para ir a travà ©s de un procedimiento consular y ahà ­ probablemente surjan los problemas y tengan que esperar fuera por mucho tiempo.   Otra posible opcià ³n es el Parole in Place, pero en este caso el migrante indocumentado que ingresà ³ ilegalmente tendrà ­a que estar casado con un ciudadano que est en el Ejà ©rcito o es veterano.Por eso consultar con un abogado reputado para ver cules son las opciones. Verificar tambià ©n si es posible calificar para recibir la waiver provisional por dureza extrema, que se recibe antes de salir de los Estados Unidos. Por à ºltimo, los extranjeros que han estado ilegalmente en los Estados Unidos y ahora estn fuera del paà ­s estn sujetos, salvo excepciones, al castigo de los 3 y de los 10 aà ±os  aunque tengan una peticià ³n realizada por un cà ³nyuge. Aunque en algunos casos es posible pedir una waiver, tambià ©n conocido como perdà ³n o permiso, lo cierto es que no aplica a todos y hay que cumplir requisitos muy serios. En otras palabras, hay que tener muy claro en el caso de ser migrante indocumentado cundo se est en una situacià ³n que la ley permite ajustar el estatus por matrimonio y cundo no es posible. Es importante conocer la situacià ³n real, buscar buen consejo legal y evitar ser và ­ctimas de fraude por pate de personas sin escrà ºpulos que prometen arreglar los papeles a cambio de pagar una importante suma de dinero y por ley es imposible que se dà © lo que prometen. Test de respuestas mà ºltiples sobre la green card Este test resuelve importantes dudas e inquietudes comunes sobre la tarjeta de residencia. Se aconseja tomarlo. Este es un artà ­culo informativo. No es asesorà ­a legal.

Nurses as leaders in health care reform Coursework

Nurses as leaders in health care reform - Coursework Example Modern nurses are equipped with the ability to make decisions pertaining any level or department in an organization. Additionally, considering the time nurses spend in their practices, it would a logical strategy to allow nurses make important decisions in healthcare institutions. National Academy of Sciences (2011) points out that practices have realized the potential of nurses if trained enough to make all level decisions in their practices. For this reason, nurses are placed as the main decision makers in health institution. However, this is done in respect to their job description and work experience. Regardless of these conditions, the nursing profession is well equipped to make important decisions at all levels of a practice. Minus the influence of nursing in making such decisions, it is an obvious assumption that a practice may not be well equipped to run the institution effectively. Benefits of researching on this area revolve around having adequate evidence on the importance of nursing on important healthcare decisions. In addition, research enables one to understand different measures taken by an organization to fully take advantage of opportunity presented by the nursing practice. Through research, organizations undermining the significance of nursing in their practices change their perception on the subject. However, there are numerous challenges in conducting research in this priority. Many practices dismiss the significance of nursing in making important decisions in their healthcare facilities. For this reason, there is limited information obtained on the level at which practices allow nurses to make important decisions. Additionally, there area limited number of practices from which research can be conducted. Practices available for research are small healthcare facilities. Large healthcare institutions have a limited mandate provided to their nurses. In these institutions, nurses require authority from top

Reporting Results Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Reporting Results - Essay Example They represent loans received. The security holder is entitled to repayment of principal and receiving of interest payments. Equity securities reflect ownership of interest and trading securities get a fair value report (Finkler, 2010). For the available for sale securities, they are reported at fair value. Their income excludes the unrealized losses and gains. They are reported as separate equity part that has no effect on the year’s net income. On the hand, not-for-profit health care organizations have all debts and equity reported at fair value (Finkler, 2010). A change in the net assets includes losses and gains. These gains and losses are reflected in the unrestricted net assets unless a donor or law prohibits it. An important feature is that all debt securities are depicted at fair value inclusive of those considered held to maturity by the former group. In this category, focus is not on net income; however, importance is vested on the total available resources. This makes the inclusion of gains or losses in the net income to be

Evaluating Truth and Validity Exercise Essay Example for Free

Evaluating Truth and Validity Exercise Essay All religious authorities are concerned about the dangers of nuclear war. All politicians are concerned about the dangers of nuclear war. Therefore, all politicians are religious authorities. This argument is invalid because of two reasons. First it is an overgeneralization. How can someone actually say that all religious authorities are concerned about the dangers of nuclear war or all politicians are concerned about nuclear war? Has anyone polled all religious authorities or politicians? There can be a very few religious authorities that might think it will never happen, so there is no reason to be concerned about it, or there could also possibly be a small religious faction that believes that nuclear war will get rid of all the evil in the world and is Gods way of cleansing the world. The same can be said for politicians. Maybe there are a few that would want to start a war because of their selfish motives. One can argue that there are politicians in Syria and Iran that would love to bomb the U.S and Israel. Nothing was said about the politician having to be from this country. The second reason is that it is an illogical conclusion. One can not say that just because politicians and religious authorities share the same concerns that they will become one in the same. They just share one interest. It takes more than caring about nuclear war to become a religious authority. Religious authorities must go through a process that usually takes years of religious education, and practice. There are certain instances, of course, where some politicians are religious authorities also; however that is not predicated on the fact that they share the same view on one certain issue. â€Å"If the Social Security system is further weakened, the elderly will have to fear poverty. Therefore, if the Social Security system is not further weakened, the elderly will not have to fear poverty. This is an  overgeneralization and an illogical conclusion. It is true that if the Social Security system is further weakened, the some of the elderly will have to fear poverty, but not all of the elderly. Some elderly people are very wealthy. Other elderly people have family members who have made arrangements to take care of them and their financial needs. Of course, there will be a lot of elderly that will fear poverty without the social security checks they would be receiving once a month. Because of these reasons the argument is an overgeneralization. The argument is also an illogical conclusion because some people regardless of their social security will still be in poverty. Some people do not have a significant work history to receive a lot of money from the social security department. According to the social security department website, the average check for a retired worker is $1,294 a month. (Office, 2014) According to the United States Government the poverty level for a family of one is $980.83. (Federal Register, 2015) What must be taken into consideration is that some recipients will be well below the average social security check, and some will be well above. Those that are well below the average will be in poverty if that is all they are receiving. This argument does not account for the elderly that will not even receive a social security. They will have to fear poverty regardless of how weak or strong the social security is. â€Å"The anti-abortionists say that the fetus is human, but they have not proved it. Therefore, they have no reasonable basis for opposing abortion. This argument is invalid because of at least two reasons. The first reason it is not a valid argument is because it has been proven that the fetus is human after eight months. How could it not be human if it comes from two persons who have intercourse and conceive a fetus? This is the definition of a fetus according to Merriam-Webster an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind; specifically: a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth. In this argument, there is no mention as to how soon after conception the fetus becomes a human. Could the argument still be valid if it were eight months after conception? Another reason this is an illegitimate argument is that the argument wants a person to think that the  only reason antiabortionist oppose abortions is because the fetus is human. There are antiabortionists who have many reasons why they feel abortion is wrong. Some of the most popular reasons why some people oppose abortion are because of morality. They believe that the fetus is a human the minute it is conceived. Some people believe it to be divine intervention from God and humans do not have the right to go against Gods desires and plan. Many of these people are very religious in faith and to them it does not matter when doctors say the baby goes from being an egg to a human fetus. Another reason people oppose abortions is because of the safety of the person having the abortion. Some people feel it is an unnecessary risk to a womans health. Many women have died from complications directly resulting from abortions. Internal hemorrhaging is not very uncommon. Some women have indirect complications such as depression and anxiety. Some women have even committed suicide because of their mental health issues after having an abortion. For these several reasons, this argument is illegitimate. References Federal Register (2015) (Accessed: 21 April 2015). fetus | a human being or animal in the later stages of development before it is born (no date). (Accessed: 21 April 2015). Office, P. (2014) Social Security Administration: Social Security Basic Facts. (Accessed: 21 April 2015). Ruggiero, V. R. (2012) The Art of Thinking, a guide to critical and creative thought (10th ed.). New York, NY; Pearson